The Sonicare AirFloss Product Review

The Review

airfloss review

Sonicare Airfloss

We purchased (at no cost to the reviewers) the new Sonicare AirFloss Rechargeable for the two dentists and two dental hygienist in our dental office.  Everyone was instructed to use the Air Flosser for seven days not to talk about it with each other until the end of the testing period.  The manufacture claims

“Microdroplets of water are accelerated by pressurized air to remove plaque in-between teeth. The speed and force of these droplets are incredibly effective yet proven gentle on your gums.”

We were excited to put it to the test, below are the results:

Questionnaire and Results:

1.       What was your impression of SONICARE AIRFLOSS before you tried it?
Our reviewer’s opinions of the Air Flosser ranged from skeptical to optimistic that this new device would in fact be a replacement for flossing.
2.       How easy or difficult was the setup of the SONICARE AIRFLOSS?
Most of the panel agreed that the setup was fairly easy.  The instructions were straight forward and quick.  All of the reviewers were very excited to try this new product following the initial 24hr battery charge.
3.       How would you describe the feel and build of the SONICARE AIRFLOSS?
The panel agreed that the feel of the Air Flosser is very nice, it has a solid build.  It was heavy and felt like a quality gadget.  However the exception was the water reservoir door which is made of cheap plastic and felt like it could break off very easily.  The build of the reservoir seemed to be the weak part in the construction.
4.       Did you use the SONICARE AIRFLOSS for the full 7 days?  If not, how many? And why?
All members of the panel did not use the Air Flosser for seven days.  This was likely consistent with the individuals normal commitment to flossing and personal preference.
5.       Did you still floss while using the SONICARE AIRFLOSS?
3 of the 4 reviewers on our office panel flossed during the evaluation period.  It should be noted that the Air Flosser instructions specify that it is “not a replacement for flossing”
6.       Did the SONICARE AIRFLOSS remove debris?
All reviewers felt like some debris was removed interdentally with the Air Floss.  However, all felt like smaller well-attached debris remained (i.e. plaque).
7.       Did you find the SONICARE AIRFLOSS force to be too weak, too strong, and just right? Explain
The panel did not agree on the force of the air/water spray from the Airfloss.  Some thought the force of the spray was not powerful enough to adequately clean in between the teeth while others in the panel felt the spray uncomfortably forceful to the gums.  However, after using the Sonicare AirFloss for several days the reviewers became accustomed to the force of the Air Floss.
8.       Will you continue to us the SONICARE AIRFLOSS?
The reviewers differ again.  Some felt that they could clean their teeth just as well with floss alone and said they would not continue to use the Air Flosser.  While others on the panel felt that it cleaned their teeth better than brushing and flossing alone and do plan on using the Sonicare AirFloss in the future.
9.       Will you recommend the SONICARE AIRFLOSS to patients?  If so what type, if not, why?
All reviewers agreed that the Air Floss could be useful to ONLY certain types of patients.  Not all patients would benefit.  Those patients with limited dexterity, those resistant to flossing, people who like technology/gadgets, those with braces and those with heavy debris would all benefit from the use of the Sonicare AirFloss.
10.   Please give the SONICARE AIRFLOSS a letter grade and summarize your impressions of the SONICARE AIRFLOSS.
The grades ranged from  A- to C-.  That being said all reviewers agreed in its ability to clean between the teeth.  However, depending on the reviewer it was thought that because of the limited patient population the Air Flosser was useful that value of its usefulness was deducted.

Combined Score: B-


The Sonicare AirFloss is an interesting new product and we love that companies are trying to modernize flossing in the same way as the electric toothbrush (i.e. Sonicare Electric toothbrush).  Because such a small percentage of people brush two minutes at a time and floss daily; any device which improves on this is valuable.  That being said – there is only a certain population (mentioned above) that will truly find value in the Sonicare AirFloss, particularly given its $80.00 price point.  Bottom line, the Sonicare AirFloss is a updated remake of the 1980’s Waterpik and we while we will recommend it to a select few of our patients we would rather see our patients purchase a high quality electric toothbrush.

Today’s post was written personally by Drs. David and Janna Civils. Do you have a question for either Dr. David or Dr. Janna?  We would love to hear from you!

Drs. David and Janna Civils

1114 Magnolia Street 
Greensboro, NC


Be Sociable, Share!
This entry was posted in Bright Smiles, Dental Health, Family Dentistry, New Trends in Dentristry, Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Sonicare AirFloss Product Review

  1. willi says:

    Thanks for providing some additional insight into this product and technology, in an unbiased manner.

  2. AW says:

    I just found out about the product today and was curious. I was interested because it’s more of a reusable option to clean between teeth because I floss a LOT; but at that price point, I don’t see any gains. This is a very honest evaluation, thanks!

  3. Linda says:

    Thank you so much for the review on this product. I’ve been using a Sonicare toothbrush since they came out and can’t live without it. I was curious about this new product and think I may try it. I don’t think it will replace flossing (which I do daily) but it would be nice to maybe only floss every other day. Thanks again for taking the time to test it and post your findings!

  4. andy says:

    Am returning the product after a two day trial. Wish I had seen your review ahead of time. Being the owner of a Sonicare brush, I was hopeful the Airfloss would be a good addition to the dental routine. Your review was spot-on right down to the flimsy door on the water reservoir. Quite frankly, the droplets were so “micro” I couldn’t tell if water was being used or not. The air pressure was audible. Using the product, as suggested, from the outside of the teeth also was not productive in helping clean pockets between teeth on the inside, particularly with teeth that are tight. Nice try from a good company, but for the time being I’ll stick with my Sonicare, Waterpik and plain old flossing. Very good and very fair review.

    • Dr. Civils says:

      Thanks for reading our review and your comment. Unfortunately the Airfloss is a product that just does not meet most peoples expectation. We love the Sonicare electric toothbrushes and recommend them daily to our patients but will continue to recommend traditional flossing and interproximal brushes to clean in between the teeth.

  5. Mariana Foo says:

    I am a dental professional. I highly recommended NOT to buy this product due to its BAD battery.

    After 4 handheld replacements, last one only lasted 2 times used

    The patient handheld lasted longer 3-4 months. I asked if they find out what was wrong with the product, but they say they wouldn’t know because they are sent back to ware house and tossed. Not the first time using sonicare. But certainly will be the last time considering product and customer service. Waste of my time.

  6. Paul Gorenstein says:

    Thanks for the reviews and posting the comments. I like gadgets, dislike flossing, and am scolded every visit to the dentist and dental hygienist on the condition of my teeth. However, I conclude from the tests and comments that this device will not add much benefit to the Waterpik and the Sonicare toothbrush routine that I use twice daily.

  7. Matthew says:

    The problem is that the charger have a very short life — less than a year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>